|
CONFIRMATIONS
AND NON-CONFIRMATIONS
Once
upon a time there was the Dow Theory.
Besides observing that the market
moved in waves like the tides of ocean, and
that you could figure out which way
the market and the tides were moving
by watching whether each succeeding
wave (washing upon the beach for the
ocean and price movements for the
stock market) was higher or lower than
the previous one, it also watched
whether the transporting side of the
economy was in sync with the
manufacturing side. It realized that
if manufacturers were producing but
transports weren't transporting, then
trouble loomed down the road - like
maybe consumers weren't buying.
Also, it observed that if transports
were transporting but manufacturers
weren't producing, then trouble also
loomed down the road - something was
wrong with manufacturing. For a
healthy economy, and a healthy stock
market, both indices had to be in
sync. If one made a new high, then the
other should follow in like form. If
they didn't confirm each other's
moves, we had a non-confirmation,
and that spelled trouble. Similar
interpretations could also be made
from confirmations and
non-confirmation of lower lows.
Confirmation of lower lows was
bearish; non-confirmation was bullish.
As time passed, this type of reasoning
morphed into the relationship of the
Generals and the Soldiers. The
Generals could be defined as the
safest, Bluest of the Blue Chips,
best-quality companies available. The
Soldiers were everybody else. Theory
had it that the Generals should lead
and the soldiers should follow in
normal circumstances. If the Generals
led but the Soldiers didn't follow,
then watch out below because investors
saw trouble ahead and acted
accordingly by putting their money
into only the safest stocks. On the
other hand, if the Soldiers got
over-enthusiastic by jumping out ahead
of the Generals, this was quite
bullish because it meant investors had
a strong faith in continued healthy
conditions going forward. They were
willing to put their money into the
more marginal businesses assuming good
times ahead.
Which brings us to today.
If you go strictly by Dow Theory, the
Dow Jones Transports have been making
new all-time highs since December 17,
2004 while the Dow Jones Industrials
have languished below their 11,723
close set on January 14, 2000. Thus
you have non-confirmations stretching
over the past several years while the
markets have traded both lower and
higher. But why make your decision on
whether 30 (the Industrials) stocks
can outrun 20 stocks (the Transports)
when there are literally thousands of
stocks now in the game, and
confirmation can be interpreted
differently and more legitimately?
Why not consider the Dow Jones Industrials
as the Generals, and NASDAQ or the S
& P 500 as the Soldiers? It
utilizes the theory of whether
concentrated quality is leading the
diffused riffraff or not better than
today's Dow Theory, and gives us a
better idea of confirmations and
non-confirmations. Is everybody in
sync, or not?
So, with the Dow Jones Industrials
sitting today at 11,577, only 146
points under a new high, what should
we be thinking as we begin business
Monday morning? With the current Dow
Jones Industrial Average divisor at
0.12493117, it means each of the 30
Dow Jones Industrial Average component
stocks need rise only $0.61 to surpass
the old high mark (30 stocks
multiplied by $0.61 divided by
0.12493117).
Can that happen? Well, Duh!
Can it happen Monday? Well, Duh!
again. A mere $0.61 per each of the 30
stocks in the Industrials? But then
what? Besides the folks at Broad and
Wall breaking out the champaign, and
CNBC partying like it's 1999, what
about the non-confirmation of the
Soldiers still laboring at NASDAQ's
current 2314 (well below the all-time
high of March 10, 2000 at 5048) or the
S & P 500's current 1325 (well
below the all-time high of March 24,
2000 at 1527)?
So, as we approach a new
all-time high for the Dow Jones
Industrials, it will be significant.
Hundreds of billions of dollars will
be placed on the basis of interpretations
of the numbers. If we turn down after
making an all-time new high for the
Dow Industrials but not NASDAQ and the S & P
500, it could the Mother of All
Non-Confirmations of Soldiers and
Generals, and if we turn down prior
to making a new high on the Dow
Industrials it will be the Mother of
All Non-Confirmations for the Dow
Theory.
Bottom line: We'd better not turn down
until both Theories are confirmed, or
else - hold on to your wallet.
SURPRISES
Wall
Street got surprised this week. On
Wednesday, Cigna (CI), dropped 15% to
$90 after reporting a 19% drop in
earnings. On Thursday, Expediters
International of Washington (EXPD),
jumped 18% to $103.80, after reporting
a 70% surge in earnings, announcing a
2 for 1 stock split, and a 46%
increase of its dividend. But
why was anyone surprised? EXPD
has been a top performing stock in a
top performing industry (Air
Transport) since at least last
October. CI has been a weak stock in
the weakest sector (Heath Services)
for months. Why anyone would have had
money in CI when they could have
profited from EXPD is a good question.
Strong stocks get stronger; weak
stocks get weaker. That's the way of
the world. Why should anyone be
surprised?
FOR
THE WEEK...and
a good time was had by all.
Metal
& Mining remained in first
place for the 5th straight week, and
for the 22nd out of the past 26 weeks.
Manufacturing should benefit
from a continuing weak dollar...unless
foreign investors decide to dump
dollar-denominated assets en masse. Electronics
has good looking charts in various
areas. Transportation continues
strong, moving the freight and people. Companies have either
learned to hedge their fuel needs
(hopefully) or are able to pass along
increased costs without it affecting
their operations. Aerospace/Defense
continues its run. How can the
geopolitical news be anything but
positive for this group? Leisure's
strength is concentrated on gaming
activities and selected Restaurants. Automotive owes its
strength to foreign manufacturers. Energy
has become captive of geopolitical
news bites. Stocks certainly remain
positive in their price movements. Consumer
Durables tags along with Electronics
as the only two sectors in THE TOP
TEN which have failed to make new
all-time highs. Conglomerates
have had a good year after writing off
2005 as basically flat..
It's interesting
to note that
according to the theoretical models of
how each sector should act during stock market and economic
cycles, we see that at the peak of a bull market
run, while the economy is still
expanding, both Precious Metals
and Energy should be the
leading sectors. And that's just what
we've had over the past 9
months.
So, while we luxuriate in easy profits
recently from Energy, Metals &
Mining, and Transportation, let us
keep our eyes on Utilities, Drugs,
Health Care, Food &
Beverage, and Tobacco for
any stirring of a defensive posture by
investors. Remember, there is always a
Bull Market, and that's where
Simplespreaders should always be.
$UMMATION
As you
can see from the table below, there
are practically no opportunities
available to Simplespreaders at this
time. Everything is extended well
above buying areas. Positions initiated
previously at lower prices should
either already be closed out
profitably or looked at carefully to
see whether the risk/reward metric
merits holding them any longer.
THE
TOP TEN...
|
Sector |
05Novt05
to
05May06 |
Week
of
05 May 06 |
Option
Stocks |
Strong
Option
Stocks
|
Strong
Option Stocks Near Buying Area |
|
Metals
& Mining |
+51.5%
|
+4.97% |
89 |
75 |
4 |
|
Manufacturing |
+33.9% |
+3.48% |
65 |
40 |
0
|
|
Electronics |
+27.3% |
+3.11% |
206 |
123
|
6 |
|
Transportation |
+27.0% |
+5.42% |
63 |
20 |
0
|
|
Aerospace/Defense
|
+24.6% |
+3.14%
|
21
|
21
|
0 |
|
Leisure |
+23.6% |
+3.05% |
62 |
29 |
2
|
|
Automotive
|
+22.6% |
+3.52%
|
30
|
9
|
0 |
|
Energy |
+21.5% |
+3.09% |
154 |
62 |
5
|
|
Consumer
Durables
|
+21.3% |
+2.18%
|
46
|
16
|
1 |
|
Conglomerates |
+18.4% |
+3.46% |
17 |
10 |
0
|
|
AND THE
REST... |
|
Materials
& Construction
|
+17.7% |
+1.26%
|
56
|
The
Residential Homebuilders look
worse and worse. Their
weakness very well may bring
down the rest of the sector.
|
|
Banking
|
+17.5% |
+1.46%
|
91
|
Foreign
and Money Center banks share the
spotlight here. Regional US
banks aren't doing that great.
|
|
Computer
Hardware
|
+16.7% |
+2.13%
|
55
|
Like
all things hi-tech, trying to
claw its way back, and doing a
fair job of it.
|
|
Chemicals
|
+16.5% |
+3.36%
|
42
|
Led
by Synthetics and
Agricultural Chemicals,
this sector made it into new
high ground this week after
breaking out of an a4-month consolidation..
|
|
Financial
Services
|
+15.7% |
+1.29
|
245
|
It
should come as no surprise that
the biggest names on Wall Street
are benefiting from record
volume and a strong run-up in
prices.
|
|
Telecommunications
|
+14.6% |
+1.78%
|
133
|
Still
putting in a weak showing. Last
time in the sun = early 2004.
|
|
Real Estate
|
+14.4% |
+0.68%
|
64
|
The
past several months have
witnessed a marked selloff in
most of the REITs. Only a meager
recovery from the bombed-out
Mortgage side of the business
has kept this sector from
falling through the floor.
|
|
Consumer
Non-Durables
|
+13.7% |
+0.88%
|
71
|
Moving
slowly, as defensive issues
always do. Their poor
performance is one of lack of
momentum rather than adverse
price action. Watch for any
strengthening as a sign of
market tops.
|
|
Specialty
Retail
|
+11.9% |
-0.85%
|
65
|
Barely
bettering its 2005 top puts it
way down the list. It's
interesting that pawn brokers
have helped keep this sector in
the positive. Not much here to
excite anyone.
|
|
Utilities
|
+10.7% |
+2.53%
|
74
|
Another
bear market hedge that has
performed poorly since topping
out last fall. A good week
pushed this sector into new high
ground. Put in very good numbers
for most of 2004 and well into
2005.
|
|
Dow Jones Ind.
Avg.
|
+10.6% |
+1.85%
|
-
|
The
series of higher highs and
higher lows has the
Dow close to its all-time
high.
|
|
Diversified
Services
|
+10.1% |
+0.42%
|
118
|
A
hodgepodge of business services
with strong areas balanced out
by weak areas.
|
|
Computer
Software & Svcs
|
+9.9% |
+0.28%
|
142
|
One
of the better bounces coming off
the 2002 bottom, has lately run
out of steam.
|
|
Food &
Beverage
|
+9.8% |
+2.02%
|
44
|
Selected
breweries are about the only
thing working here. Keep your
eyes on this sector for strength
indicating weakness the rest of
the market.
|
|
Insurance |
+9.8% |
+1.00% |
69 |
Life
insurance is on a tear, but
other than the pop after the
fall storms last year, this
sector has been dead in the
water.
|
|
Retail |
+9.4% |
+2.57% |
66 |
Dullness
affects the whole sector.
|
|
Tobacco |
+9.3% |
+1.77% |
8 |
Like
Consumer Non-Durables above, the
price appreciation is
respectable but just lagging so
many other sectors.
|
|
Drugs |
+9.2% |
+0.37% |
200 |
Biotechnology
last year, and smaller Drug
companies this year are the only
bright spots in this sector
going back over 3 years. All in
all, a total disappointment,
plus various laws suits don't
help. But this sector can be a
good bear market hedge...if it
comes to that..
|
|
Wholesale |
+9.0% |
+0.61% |
50 |
Paced
by industrial and building
stocks, but held down by food,
drug, and electronics, this
sector has barely kept up with
the market.
|
|
Media |
+8.6% |
+1.31% |
70 |
The
sector is going through the
biggest upheaval of them all
when it comes to business
models. And it's reflected in
stock prices. Great upside
potential if and when things get
sorted out, and a very real
potential recovery during the
next market cycle. But we aren't
there yet.
|
|
Internet |
+0.6% |
-0.29% |
70 |
So
the internet revolution is here,
but where are the stocks?
Nothing can match this sector
for explosive price growth when
they get up a head of steam, but
that hasn't happened recently.
Last good run = November to this
past March. Can swing into
action at any time. Definitely deserves
to keep an eye on.
|
|
Health
Services |
-1.59% |
-1.48% |
142 |
Not
only worst performer over the
last 6 months, but suffers an
actual price decline of about 8%
since the highs in January. Ugh!
No bright spots or even good
potentials. The sector has a lot
of work to do to right itself.
And when it does, few other
sectors can rival the profit
opportunities.
|
|